<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lynching &amp; Racism in Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/</link>
	<description>Back Room Disputations Resulting in Truthful Gestations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:02:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: centrum handlowe</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-5462</link>
		<dc:creator>centrum handlowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-5462</guid>
		<description>Respect, administrator can I use a little of the advice from this post if I put a hyperlink back to ur website ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respect, administrator can I use a little of the advice from this post if I put a hyperlink back to ur website ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enda Orehek</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-5461</link>
		<dc:creator>Enda Orehek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-5461</guid>
		<description>Why have you deleted my post? It was very useful information and i assure atleast one person found it helpful unlike the rest of the comments on this web site. I&#039;ll post it again. Sick and tired of obtaining low amounts of useless visitors to your site? Well i wish to share with you a fresh underground tactic which makes me personally $900  every day on 100% AUTOPILOT. I really could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you simply check their website out? There is a great video that explains everything. So if your serious about making hassle-free cash this is the site for you. &lt;a href=&quot;http://autotrafficavalanche.jp22.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Auto Traffic Avalanche&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why have you deleted my post? It was very useful information and i assure atleast one person found it helpful unlike the rest of the comments on this web site. I&#8217;ll post it again. Sick and tired of obtaining low amounts of useless visitors to your site? Well i wish to share with you a fresh underground tactic which makes me personally $900  every day on 100% AUTOPILOT. I really could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you simply check their website out? There is a great video that explains everything. So if your serious about making hassle-free cash this is the site for you. <a href="http://autotrafficavalanche.jp22.net" rel="nofollow">Auto Traffic Avalanche</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoth tarot</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>thoth tarot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>Excellent document and I love your mind-set towards boosting standards. Thanks for putting this particular information up. This is EXACTLY what I have been searching for. Always keep blogging. Looking forward to reading your next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent document and I love your mind-set towards boosting standards. Thanks for putting this particular information up. This is EXACTLY what I have been searching for. Always keep blogging. Looking forward to reading your next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverend Gonzo</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>This is nothing to do with freedom of speech. Freedom of speech referes to censorship by the government. It is also what allows private entities to do as they please. Just like the Boy Scouts are allowed to prevent gays from joining their organization; just like private schools are allowed to prevent people of a certain race or religion from attending their schools. It is what gives the KKK the right to have public demonstrations (after acquiring the proper permits, of course).

However, freedom of speech does not give everybody the right to be heard. Here&#039;s the difference: you are allowed to say whatever you want, but you are not allowed to force others to repeat your message. NBC is not, by any means, required to allow her to say anything she wants on her channel. And it is NOT censhorship. It is PR and smart business.

Now, if the government passes a law saying that certain words cannot be used, THAT is censorship.

The thing with lynching (and nooses and burning crosses) is that they have no history in the United States except as part of slavery and segregation, and because of that, they are considered to be &quot;terms used to incite violence or fear&quot; (I forget the actual legal words.)

I have no doubt Al Sharpton is also taking it overboard, like he did with &quot;nappy-headed hos&quot;. However, at the same time, this woman is a fucking idiot. There are ways you speak to your friends or your cowrkers around the water fountain, and there are ways you speak professionally. She most definitely should be reprimanded for being extremely unprofessional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing to do with freedom of speech. Freedom of speech referes to censorship by the government. It is also what allows private entities to do as they please. Just like the Boy Scouts are allowed to prevent gays from joining their organization; just like private schools are allowed to prevent people of a certain race or religion from attending their schools. It is what gives the KKK the right to have public demonstrations (after acquiring the proper permits, of course).</p>
<p>However, freedom of speech does not give everybody the right to be heard. Here&#8217;s the difference: you are allowed to say whatever you want, but you are not allowed to force others to repeat your message. NBC is not, by any means, required to allow her to say anything she wants on her channel. And it is NOT censhorship. It is PR and smart business.</p>
<p>Now, if the government passes a law saying that certain words cannot be used, THAT is censorship.</p>
<p>The thing with lynching (and nooses and burning crosses) is that they have no history in the United States except as part of slavery and segregation, and because of that, they are considered to be &#8220;terms used to incite violence or fear&#8221; (I forget the actual legal words.)</p>
<p>I have no doubt Al Sharpton is also taking it overboard, like he did with &#8220;nappy-headed hos&#8221;. However, at the same time, this woman is a fucking idiot. There are ways you speak to your friends or your cowrkers around the water fountain, and there are ways you speak professionally. She most definitely should be reprimanded for being extremely unprofessional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5cents</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>5cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>@ Gonzo: I agree Tilghman is likely not a racist. I don&#039;t think it was that stupid of a comment to make either. Perhaps that&#039;s because I simply don&#039;t associate certain words with certain races.

The networks certainly suspended her because they felt some action was needed on their part. It is a PR thing. Nevertheless, it is setting the wrong type of precedent. We should be trying to remove race from the table, not put it higher on the pedestal.

@ BennyBoy: Good point on freedom of speech and certainly were the comments aired in the general public she would have been protected. As an employee of the Golf Channel, they naturally have the right to discipline her in whatever way they see fit. Also, Tilghman apologized to Tiger and he accepted. I&#039;m sure he had no idea what all the ruckus was about because like you said, he didnt comment on the issue. I couldn&#039;t say it better myself, Sharpton is a media whore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Gonzo: I agree Tilghman is likely not a racist. I don&#8217;t think it was that stupid of a comment to make either. Perhaps that&#8217;s because I simply don&#8217;t associate certain words with certain races.</p>
<p>The networks certainly suspended her because they felt some action was needed on their part. It is a PR thing. Nevertheless, it is setting the wrong type of precedent. We should be trying to remove race from the table, not put it higher on the pedestal.</p>
<p>@ BennyBoy: Good point on freedom of speech and certainly were the comments aired in the general public she would have been protected. As an employee of the Golf Channel, they naturally have the right to discipline her in whatever way they see fit. Also, Tilghman apologized to Tiger and he accepted. I&#8217;m sure he had no idea what all the ruckus was about because like you said, he didnt comment on the issue. I couldn&#8217;t say it better myself, Sharpton is a media whore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny Boy</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-409</guid>
		<description>and by the way... let us not forget about a real american hero who led the civil right movement back in the 60&#039;s. Martin Luther King!!  

Mr. Sharpton needs to go back and learn a thing or two from MLK. 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080121/pl_nm/usa_politics_dc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and by the way&#8230; let us not forget about a real american hero who led the civil right movement back in the 60&#8217;s. Martin Luther King!!  </p>
<p>Mr. Sharpton needs to go back and learn a thing or two from MLK. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080121/pl_nm/usa_politics_dc" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080121/pl_nm/usa_politics_dc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny Boy</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>I believe that both commentators where somewhat out of place by having such a conversation on a golf channel. I agree, that it was definitely unprofessional. However, not at any point in the conversation I found it to be racial.  Or be deeming of a 2 weeks suspension. Thats just ridiculous!  What ever happen to freedom of speech? or freedom of press? those are the rights that are being oppressed by the issue at hand.  Yes, Tiger deserves an apology. But has he even demanded one? I haven&#039;t heard any comments from Tiger himself??

As for Al Sharpton, he is always looking for any kind of media attention. As we say during our Wed Night Mayhem show, Mr. SHarpton is nothing more than a media whore.  He reminds me of those ambulance chasing attorneys... you guys see the resemblance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that both commentators where somewhat out of place by having such a conversation on a golf channel. I agree, that it was definitely unprofessional. However, not at any point in the conversation I found it to be racial.  Or be deeming of a 2 weeks suspension. Thats just ridiculous!  What ever happen to freedom of speech? or freedom of press? those are the rights that are being oppressed by the issue at hand.  Yes, Tiger deserves an apology. But has he even demanded one? I haven&#8217;t heard any comments from Tiger himself??</p>
<p>As for Al Sharpton, he is always looking for any kind of media attention. As we say during our Wed Night Mayhem show, Mr. SHarpton is nothing more than a media whore.  He reminds me of those ambulance chasing attorneys&#8230; you guys see the resemblance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverend Gonzo</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe Tilghman is necessarily racist. I don&#039;t know anything else she has said, and this is of course just a small piece. However, she is a fucking idiot.

As a professional newscaster, and on the job, she really should have better judgment than to say a comment like that over the air.

I personally however, wouldn&#039;t fire her for being a racist. I would however her beat her over the head for being an idiot.

As for the network, they really have no choice but to suspend her. Unless they want a massive portion of the population screaming bloody murder, they have to take some sort of action. It&#039;s just PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe Tilghman is necessarily racist. I don&#8217;t know anything else she has said, and this is of course just a small piece. However, she is a fucking idiot.</p>
<p>As a professional newscaster, and on the job, she really should have better judgment than to say a comment like that over the air.</p>
<p>I personally however, wouldn&#8217;t fire her for being a racist. I would however her beat her over the head for being an idiot.</p>
<p>As for the network, they really have no choice but to suspend her. Unless they want a massive portion of the population screaming bloody murder, they have to take some sort of action. It&#8217;s just PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5cents</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>5cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Always thought of her as a racist? As in, you had these suspicions before?

If lynching has only one meaning, it should be the formal one, murder without due process usually by hanging. Tilghman is obviously not suggesting this. Just like an &quot;ass-whupping&quot; could involve getting kicked solely in the nuts with no ass-abuse in sight. It&#039;s a figure of speech. Black people do not own the rights to the word &quot;lynch.&quot; Black people have been lynched, yes, but so have asians and native americans. Are they in uproar, erm no.

Would Tilghman have been suspended if Tiger Woods was white? If yes, then the implication is that &quot;lynch&quot; is an offensive word, which it is not. If no, the implication is we can&#039;t say lynch to black people. And i suppose we can&#039;t make gas-jokes to Jews. Or real-estate comments to native americans...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always thought of her as a racist? As in, you had these suspicions before?</p>
<p>If lynching has only one meaning, it should be the formal one, murder without due process usually by hanging. Tilghman is obviously not suggesting this. Just like an &#8220;ass-whupping&#8221; could involve getting kicked solely in the nuts with no ass-abuse in sight. It&#8217;s a figure of speech. Black people do not own the rights to the word &#8220;lynch.&#8221; Black people have been lynched, yes, but so have asians and native americans. Are they in uproar, erm no.</p>
<p>Would Tilghman have been suspended if Tiger Woods was white? If yes, then the implication is that &#8220;lynch&#8221; is an offensive word, which it is not. If no, the implication is we can&#8217;t say lynch to black people. And i suppose we can&#8217;t make gas-jokes to Jews. Or real-estate comments to native americans&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darlene</title>
		<link>http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Darlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backwomb.com/2008/01/20/lynching-in-conversation/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I always thought of her as an out of the closet rascist.
As a professional newscaster isn&#039;t her job to choose her words wisely? I mean, there is only one definition of getting a good lynching right?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought of her as an out of the closet rascist.<br />
As a professional newscaster isn&#8217;t her job to choose her words wisely? I mean, there is only one definition of getting a good lynching right?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
