Keep up the good work!

Women do not have a purpose, biologically, to gain as much semen as they can. Their purpose to find the *best* semen. Given that they can only have children so often it is in their best interest (biologically) to only have viable eggs when around the best sperm.

There was a study done a while back with married women who were having an affair. They were told to keep daily calendar of when they had sex with their husband, when they had sex with their lover, and the dates of their menstrual cycle, and some other biological things. Well, what the researchers found out was that the wives were (inadvertantly) cheating on days they had the most egg production and were sleeping with their husbands when they wouldn’t get pregnant. So, subconsciously, or even lower on the brain stem than subconscious, as purely biologically, when their eggs were most viable they would *only* mate with who the woman (biologically) considered the better sperm, or the alpha.

On the same note, as men are constantly producing sperm (and hence the reason for a lack of real men’s birth control), and we are not affected by birth, it is in our best interest (biologically) to spread the sperm to as many women as possible.

(For the feminists out there, this is not me being chauvinistic. This is biology.)

From an evolutionary standpoint, this stands true as well. As females are only able to give birth (at a maximum rate of) once every nine months, and I believe it’s a bit less than that, in order for evolution to work, they need to make sure the best genes go forward. On the same account, for maximum chance survival of the males, it is in their best interest that their genes are spread as much as possible.

And therefore, I would have no doubt in my mind that sperm cells would have evolved to actually have chemicals to try and prevent the woman from desiring other sperms.